EVALUATION OF THE SHIELDING COEFFICIENT BY CRITICAL SYSTEM FUSELAGE IN THE COMPOSITION OF THE AIRCRAFT
Abstract
This article discusses the problems of ensuring the flight safety of aircraft using electrical / electronic systems when exposed to high-intensity electromagnetic fields. A method is being developed for analyzing the impact of high-intensity radiated fields that create an electromagnetic environment in the aircraft location area, based on the main factors of the aircraft electromagnetic compatibility, such as the electromagnetic environment, the mechanism of communication or action, the sensitivity or susceptibility of electromagnetic radiation receivers with threshold values of interference in the frequency and time domains. Two methods for assessing the aircraft resistance to high-intensity electromagnetic fields are analyzed: high-level scan tests and low-level scan tests. The purpose of this article is to estimate the fuselage shielding coefficient in the places where critical systems units are installed using software for numerical electrodynamic modeling. The objective of the study is to create and calculate a mathematical model of the critical system as part of an aircraft. The article developed electrodynamic models of the critical system of the aircraft – a multifunctional liquid crystal indicator, and the calculation is carried out in the Ansys HFSS full-wave electrodynamic design package. Reasonable simplifications are made to the HFSS cockpit model for calculating the fuselage-shielding factor. Simplifying the model means eliminating small parts and objects that are much shorter than the wavelength and reducing the model's area of study, since the critical system blocks are located in the front of the cockpit. The estimation of the fuselage-shielding factor in the frequency range from 100 MHz to 1 GHz is carried out, the analysis and comparison of the results obtained with the tests in the aircraft are carried out. The results are of a similar nature, however, the calculated values of the shielding factor are 5–15 dB lower in the frequency range from 400 to 850 MHz. Also in the frequency range up to 400 MHz, there are characteristic resonant "dips" of the screening coefficient. The results obtained will make it possible to single out the most dangerous sources and zones of excitation of electromagnetic interference for subsequent detailed analysis, and to reduce the time and cost of testing.
References
bortovoe oborudovanie VS [The impact of external electromagnetic fields of high intensity on
the on-board equipment of the AIRCRAFT], Sb. nauchnykh trudov GosNII GA [Collection of
scientific works of GosNII GA], 2010, No. 311, pp. 75-85.
2. ARP5583. Guide to Certification of Aircraft in a High Intensity Radiated Field (HIRF) Environment.
2010.
3. Shvab A.Y. Elektromagnitnaya sovmestimost' [Electromagnetic compatibility]. Moscow:
Energoatomizdat, 1998, 466 p.
4. EUROCAE ED 107. Guide to certification of aircraft in a high-intensity radiated field (HIRF)
environment. 2010.
5. AC/AMJ 20.1317. The certification of aircraft electrical and electronic systems for operation
in the High Intensity Radiated Field (HIRF) Environment., 1998.
6. The Federal Aviation Regulations USA (FARs), part 25.
7. Certification Specification CS-25 EASA.
8. AP-25. Aviatsionnye pravila. Normy letnoy godnosti samoletov transportnoy kategorii
[AP-25. Aviation regulations. Standards of airworthiness of transport category aircraft].
9. KT 160D. Kvalifikatsionnye trebovaniya. Razdel 20.0 Radiochastotnaya vospriimchivost'
(radioizluchenie i provodimost'), AR MAK, 2004 [CT 160D. Qualification requirements. Section
20.0 Radio Frequency susceptibility (Radio emission and conductivity), AR IAC, 2004].
10. Miller D.C. Aircraft and Subsystem Level HIRF Test Methods, SAE Transactions, 1990, Vol.
99, pp. 1771-1783.
11. Shi G., Liao Y., Ying X. Zhang Y. Methods of high intensity radiated field testing for civil
aircraft, 2017 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC EUROPE),
Angers, 2017.
12. Huiying Li, Mark Bolsover, Junhui Ye, Linfang Yan. The Role of Electromagnetic Compatibility
Qualification Considerations in Airborne System Integration Programs, Procedia Engineering,
2015, Vol. 99, pp. 208-213.
13. Bankov C.E., Guttsayt E.M., Kurushin A.A. Reshenie opticheskikh i SVCh zadach s
pomoshch'yu HFSS [Solving optical and microwave problems using HFSS]. Moscow: OOO
«Orkada», 2012, 250 p.
14. Patrick Hindle. 5 Leading EDA Tools for EMC/EMI Design Challenges, Microwave journal,
2017, No. 7, pp. 20-40.
15. Sayt kompanii-razrabotchika programmnogo produkta ANSYS EMIT [Website of the company-
developer of the software product ANSYS EMI]. Available at: https://www.ansys.com/
products/electronics/radio-frequency-interference.
16. Sayt kompanii-razrabotchika programmnogo produkta NX [Website of the company that develops
the NX software product]. Available at: https:www.ideal-plm.ru/uEditor/files/4/
397/ObzorNX.pdf.
17. Emmanuel Perrin, Fabrice Tristant, Christophe Guiffaut, Fabien Terrade, Alain Reineix. A
3D Model to compute lightning and HIRF coupling effects on avionic equipment of an aircraft,
2012 ESA Workshop on Aerospace EMC, May 2012, Venise, Italy, pp. 1-5.
18. Cui Y. and Cui C. A developing method of aircraft HIRF/L preventive maintenance program,
2013 International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering
(QR2MSE), Chengdu, 2013, pp. 1215-1218.
19. Nalbantoglu C., Kiehl T., God R., Stadtler T., Kebel R. and Bienert R. Electromagnetic compatibility
(EMC) for integration and use of near field communication (NFC) in aircraft, 2016
ESA Workshop on Aerospace EMC (Aerospace EMC), Valencia, 2016, pp. 1-6.
20. DO-294C - Guidance on Allowing Transmitting Portable Electronic Devices (T-PEDS) on
Aircraft, Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
21. DO-307 - Aircraft Design and Certification for Portable Electronic Device (PED) Tolerance,
Washington, DC, USA, 2007.