ALGORITHM FOR OPTIMAL CONTROL THE DIGITAL TWIN OF THE ENTERPRISE

Abstract

The volume of processed information increases when analyzing and control the activities of an enterprise as a system. The amount of processed information directly depends on the dimension of this system. In the work, the activity of the enterprise is formalized as a digital twin of the enterprise. The digital twin of the enterprise is analyzed as a dynamic system. The enterprise was identified as a dynamic system. The digital twin of the enterprise is formalized as V. Leontiev's balance model. An algorithm for optimal control of the digital twin of the enterprise has been created. The following functions are considered as parameters of optimal control: the trajectory of the system, the execution time of the algorithm and the indicator of the state of the system. In the algorithm for enterprise control, the following methods were used: Bloom's taxonomy, the competence of graduates in the SFU specialties and the National Qualifications Framework of the Russian Federation. The identification of the enterprise processes is carried out by the method for which the patent has been obtained. The algorithm is implemented in the author's software package for analyzing a system with a dimension of 1.2 million values. The study showed significant changes in the values of the optimal control functions characterizing the states of a dynamic object, depending on the selected techniques. Calculations have shown how the choice of control method affects the optimality of decisions. The state of the enterprise is displayed through the competencies of the personnel: psychomotor, cognitive and affective. It was found that with low cognitive and affective abilities of the staff, psychomotor activity begins to prevail, which leads to little result. With the growth of the cognitive abilities of thepersonnel, psychomotor activity becomes more adequate to the internal tasks and the influence of the parameters of the external environment. An integral indicator was used to assess the implementation of methods in enterprise control. The estimation of the optimality of the solution for control the digital twin of the enterprise as a dynamic system is carried out.

Authors

References

1. Viner N. Kibernetika [Cybernetics]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Sov. radio, 1968, 258 p.
2. Krasovskiy A.A. Istoricheskiy ocherk razvitiya i sostoyaniya teorii upravleniya [Historical
outline of the development and state of control theory], Sovremennaya prikladnaya teoriya
upravleniya [Modern Applied Control Theory]. Part I. Taganrog: Izd-vo TRTU, 2000, 400 p.
3. Tsypkin Ya.Z. Adaptatsiya i obuchenie v avtomaticheskikh sistemakh [Adaptation and training
in automatic systems]. Moscow: Nauka, 1968, 400 p.
4. Ressler O.E. Chemical Turbulence: Chaos in a Small Reaction-Diffusion System, Naturforsch,
1976, Vol. 31, pp. 1168-1172.
5. Tyukin I. Adaptation in Dynamical Systems. UK, Cambridge University Press, 2011, 410 p.
6. Lorenz E.N. Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow, J. Atoms. Sci., 1963, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 130-141.
7. Birkgof Dzh. Dinamicheskie sistemy [Dynamic systems]. Moscow: OGIZ, 1999, 480 p.
ISBN 5-7029-0356-0.
8. Gukenkheymer Dzh., Kholms F. Nelineynye kolebaniya, dinamicheskie sistemy i bifurkatsii
vektornykh poley [Nonlinear oscillations, dynamical systems and bifurcations of vector fields],
2002, 560 p. ISBN 5-93972-200-8.
9. Palis Zh., di Melu V. Geometricheskaya teoriya dinamicheskikh sistem: Vvedenie [Geometric
theory of dynamical systems: Introduction]. Moscow: Mir, 1986, 301 p.
10. Golestani M., Mohammadzaman I., Yazdanpanah M.J. Robust Finite-Time Stabilization of
Uncertain Nononlinear Systems Based on Partial Stability, Nonlinear Dy-namics, 2016,
Vol. 85, No. 1, pp. 87-96.
11. Haddad W.M., L’Afflitto A. Finite-Time Partial Stability and Stabilization, and Optimal
Feedbaсk Control, Journal of the Franklin Institute, 2015, Vol. 352, No. 6, pp. 2329-2357.
12. Jammazi C., Abichou A. Controllability of Linearized Systems Implies Local Finite-Time
Stabilizability: Applications to Finite-Time Attitude Control, Journal of Mathematical Control
and Information, 2018, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 249-277.
13. Jenkins M., et al. Export Processing Zones in Latin America. Harvard Institute for International
Development, Development Discussion Paper, 1998, No. 646 (August).
14. Kumar A., Shankar R., Choudhary A., Thakur L.S. A big data MapReduce framework for fault
diagnosis in cloud-based manufacturing, International Journal of Production Research, 2016,
Vol. 54 (23), pp. 7060-7073.
15. L’Afflitto A. Differential Games, Finite-Time Partial-State Stabilization of Nonlinear Dynamical
Systems, and Optimal Robust Control, International Journal of Control, 2017, Vol. 90,
No. 9, pp. 1861-1878.
16. Leontief W.W. “The Structure of American Economy,” 1919-1939. Cambridge, Harvard University
Press, 1941.
17. Krotov V.F. Osnovy optimal'nogo upravleniya [The basics of optimal management]. Moscow:
Vysshaya shkola, 1990, 430 p.
18. Kleyner G.B. Proizvodstvennye funktsii: Teoriya, metody, primenenie [Production functions:
Theory, methods, application]. Moscow: Finansy i statistika, 1986, 239 p.
19. Kantorovich L.V. Matematiko-ekonomicheskie raboty [Mathematical and economic work].
Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2011, 760 p.
20. Solow R. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics,
1956, No. 70, pp. 65-94.
21. Schminke A., J. Van Biesebroeck. Using export market performance to evaluate regional preferential
policies in China, Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv). Springer;
Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), June 2013, Vol. 149 (2),
pp. 343-367.
22. Masaev S.N. Model' mezhotraslevogo balansa Leont'eva kak zadacha upravleniya dinamicheskoy
sistemoy [Leontev input-ouput balance model as a dynamic system control problem],
Vestnik MGTU im. N.E. Baumana. Ser. Priborostroenie [Herald of the Bauman Moscow State
Technical University. Series Instrument Engineering], 2021, No. 2 (135), pp. 66-82.
Doi: ttps://doi.org/10.18698/0236-3933-2021-2-66-82.
23. Masaev S.N. Metodika kompleksnoy otsenki upravlencheskikh resheniy v proizvodstvennykh
sistemakh s primeneniem korrelyatsionnoy adaptometrii: dis. … kand. tekhn. nauk [Methodology
for the integrated assessment of managerial decisions in production systems using correlation
adaptometry: cand. of eng. sc. diss]: 05.13.06: protected 25.03.11: approved 25.11.11.
Krasnoyarsk: SFU, 2011, 214 p.
24. Masaev S.N. Sposob identifikacii ob"ekta kak sistemy [Method of identifying object as system].
Patent RF, No. 2741138, 2021.
25. Masaev S. Depth of Planning the State of a Dynamic Discrete System by Autocorrelation
Function, Proceedings - 2020 International Russian Automation Conference, RusAutoCon
2020. Sochi, 2020, pp. 989-993. Doi 10.1109/RusAutoCon49822.2020.9208187.
26. Masaev S.N. Algoritm otsenki sostoyaniya sistemy (sanktsii, HR, TQM, PMBOK, COVID-19,
pozharnaya bezopasnost') metodom integral'nykh pokazateley [Algorithm for assessing the
state of the system (sanctions, HR, TQM, PMBOK, Covid-19, fire safety) by the method of integrated
indicators], Vestnik Astrakhanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta.
Seriya: Upravlenie, vychislitel'naya tekhnika i informatika [Vestnik of Astrakhan State Technical
University. Series: Management, Computer Science and Informatics], 2021, No. 1, pp.
36-48. Doi 10.24143/2072-9502-2021-1-36-48.
27. Doran G.T. There’s a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management’s goals and objectives, Management
Review. СФУ 1981. СФУ Vol. 70. СФУ Is. 11 (AMA Forum). СФУ P. 35, 36.
28. Chandler A.D. Strategy and Structure: A Chapter in the History of Industrial Enterprises.
Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press, 1962, 463 p.
29. BS 7799-3:2006 “Information security management systems – Part 3: Guidelines for information
security risk management”.
30. Forsberg K. and Mooz H. The Relationship of Systems Engineering to the Project Cycle, The
12th INTERNET World Congress on Project Management, Center for Systems Management
Oslo, Norway, 1994, 12 p.
31. "HERMES". Federal IT Steering Unit FITSU. Swiss Government. Retrieved 13 May 2016.
32. VZPM Verein zur Zertifizierung von Projektmanagern der SPM Gesellschaft fur Projektman
agement and der SGO Gesellschaft fur Organisation: Beurteilungsstruktur, Begleitmaterial zur
Zertifizierung von Projektmanagern, Switzerland, Ausgabe 1996, Version 1.00 vom
30.11.1996.
33. Ebel N. PRINCE 2:2009 TM – fur Projekt management mit Methode. Munchen, Addison-
Wesley Verlag, 2011, 568 p.
34. DIN 69901-1 Projektmanagement – Projektmanagementsysteme Teil1: Grundlagen. Berlin:
Normenausschuss Qualitätsmanagament, Statistik und Zerttifizieungsgrundlagen (NQSZ) im
DIN, 2009, 30 р.
35. ISO Guide 73:2002. Risk management - Vocabulary - Guidelines for use in standards.
36. ISO/IEC 13335-1:2004. Information technology – Security techniques – Management of information and
communications technology security – Part 1: Concepts and models for information and communications
technology security management.
37. GOST 1.2–2015 «Mezhgosudarstvennaya sistema standartizatsii. Standarty
mezhgosudarstvennye, pravila i rekomendatsii po mezhgosudarstvennoy standartizatsii. Pravila
razrabotki, prinyatiya, obnovleniya i otmeny» [GOST 1.2–2015 «Mezhgosudarstvennaya sistema
standartizacii. Standarty mezhgosudarstvennye, pravila i rekomendacii po mezhgosudarstvennoj
standartizacii. Pravila razrabotki, prinyatiya, obnovleniya i otmeny»].
38. Seyfi T.F. Slagaemye vysokogo kachestva [High quality components]. Gor'kiy: Volgo-
Vyatskoe izd-vo, 1960.
39. Seyfi T.F., Bakaev V.I., Skvortsov T.P. Proizvodstvennye osnovy nadezhnosti [Manufacturing
fundamentals of reliability]. Moscow: Izd-vo standartov, 1966.
40. CAN/CSA-ISO 10006-98 Quality management - Guidelines to quality in project management.
National Standard of Canada. Available at: https://www.scc.ca/en/standardsdb/standards/7041.
41. Australian Institute for Project Management. National Competence Standard for Project Management
– Guidelines. Australian Institute for Project Management. 1996. Australia.
42. Chung К., Lee H.C., Jung К.H. Korean Management: Global Strategy and Cultural Transformation.
Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1997.
43. Guidebook of Project & Program Management for Enterprise Innovation (P2M), 2005.
Available at: http://www.pmaj.or.jp/ENG/.
44. Adizes I. Upravlenie zhiznennym tsiklom korporatsii = Managing Corporate Lifecycles [Managing
Corporate Lifecycles]. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2007, 384 p. (Teoriya menedzhmenta).
ISBN 978-5-469-01523-9.
45. Webb J.F. Space Age Management. NY.: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1969.
46. Kvalifikatsionnyy spravochnik dolzhnostey rukovoditeley, spetsialistov i drugikh
sluzhashchikh utverzhden postanovleniem Mintruda Rossii ot 21 avgusta 1998 g. № 37 [The
qualification reference book of the positions of managers, specialists and other employees was
approved by the decree of the Ministry of Labor of Russia dated August 21, 1998 No. 37].
47. Prikaz Ministerstva obrazovaniya i nauki RF ot 12 sentyabrya 2013 g. N 1061 "Ob
utverzhdenii perechney spetsial'nostey i napravleniy podgotovki vysshego obrazovaniya"
(s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami) [Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian
Federation of September 12, 2013 N 1061 "On approval of the lists of specialties and areas
of training for higher education" (with amendments and additions)].
48. Sovet Evropy: Simpozium po teme «Klyuchevye kompetentsii dlya Evropy» [Council of Europe:
Symposium on Key Competencies for Europe]: Dok. DECS / SC / Sec. (96) 43. Bern, 1996.
49. Shared ‘Dublin’ descriptors for Short Cycle, First Cycle, Second Cycle and Third Cycle
Awards. A report from a Joint Quality Initiative informal group (contributors to the document
are provided in the Annex). 18 October2004. Available at: http://www.nvao.net/page/ downloads/
Dublin_Descriptors.pdf.
50. Kommunique von Maastricht zu den zukünftigen Priorit ten der verst rkten europ ischen
Zusammenarbeit in der Berufsbildung, Maastricht 14. Dezember 2004.
51. Der europäische Qualifikationsrahmen für lebenslanges Lernen (EQR), Luxemburg 2008.
Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/publ/pdf/eqf/broch_de.pdf.
52. Maket: Ramki professional'nykh kvalifikatsiy v oblasti upravleniya personalom. Natsional'nyy
sovet pri Prezidente Rossiyskoy Federatsii po professional'nym kvalifikatsiyam [Layout:
Framework for professional qualifications in personnel management. National Council for
Professional Qualifications under the President of the Russian Federation]. Available at:
http://sovethr.ru/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%
BA%D1%82-%D0%9E%D0%A0%D0%9A-HR-v1.pdf.
53. Backlund F., Choronner D., Sundqvist E. Project Management Maturity Models. A Critical
Review. A case study within Swedish engineering and construction organizations, 27th IPMA
World Congress, 2014, No. 119, pp. 837-846.
54. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), 5th Edition,
Project Management Institute (PMI), USA, 2012.
55. A guidebook of Projekt&Program Management For Enterprise Innovation. PMCC/ENNA,
Japan, 2002.
56. "HERMES". Federal IT Steering Unit FITSU. Swiss Government. Retrieved 13 May 2016.
57. Bloom, B.S. and Krathwohl D.R. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of
Educational Goals, by a committee of college and university examiners. Handbook I: Cognitive
Domain. NY, NY: Longmans, Green, 1956.
58. Anderson J.W., Krathwhol D.R., Airasia P.W. A Taxanomy for learning, teaching and assessing:
a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of education. New York, 2003, 336 p.
59. Bellman R. Dynamic programming, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1957.
60. Gorban A.N., Tyukina T.A., Smirnova E.V., Pokidysheva L.I. Evolution of adaptation mechanisms:
adaptationenergy, stress, and oscillating death, J. of Theoretical Biology, 2016, pp. 127-139.
61. Masaev S.N. Kontseptsiya postroeniya struktury upravleniya dinamicheskoy sistemoy [The concept
of creating a dynamic system control structure]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy.
Priborostroenie [Journal of Instrument Engineering], 2021, Vol. 64, No. 1, pp. 40-46.
Doi: 10.17586/0021-3454-2021-64-1-40-46.
62. Masaev S.N. Identifikatsiya ob"ekta kak sistemy na osnove integral'nykh pokazateley [Identification
of an object as a system based on integral indicators], Informatizatsiya i svyaz'
[Informatization and communication], 2020, No. 6, pp. 65-67.
63. Masaev S.N. Assessment various control methods a digital copy of enterprise by integral indicator,
Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation, 2020,
pp. 32011. Doi 10.1088/1742-6596/1679/3/032011.
64. Masaev S.N., Dorrer G.A., Cyganov V.V. Acceptable area of optimal control for a multidimensional
system, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation, 2020,
pp. 22091. Doi 10.1088/1742-6596/1679/2/022091.
65. Masaev S.N. 2019 Destruction of the Resident Enterprise in the Special Economic Zone with
Sanctions Twelfth Int. Conf. "Management of large-scale system development" (MLSD)
(Moscow: Russia, IEEE), pp. 1-5. Doi: 10.1109/MLSD.2019.8910997.

Скачивания

Published:

2021-08-11

Issue:

Section:

SECTION I. INFORMATION PROCESSING ALGORITHMS

Keywords:

Control theory, digital twin of an enterprise, dynamic system, parameters of the external environment, optimal control, algorithm, methods