DESIGN OF SILICON MICROPROBE FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE NEURAL INTERFACE
Abstract
Microprobes have become an important tool in the study of brain activity. Research and development in the field of invasive neurointerfaces is aimed at reducing the characteristic damage to the nervous tissue by reducing the diameter of the implanted probes to less than 100 μm. Such structures are produced by micromachining, in particular, by types of anisotropic etching. In this case, the size and shape of the probe are influenced by the etching conditions. The latter should betaken into account at the designing of the probe. The paper evaluates the ranges of the geometric parameters of a silicon microprobe taking into account the etching conditions and the number of electrodes. Analytical calculations were carried out for the structure of the probe, represented by four regions of different widths, carrying up to seven electrodes. The dependences of bottom base width of a trapezoidal section of the probe and the size of the mask on the thickness and width of the top base are received. The admissible ranges of sizes for the proposed case of the four-level microprobe are established; in particular, the minimum values of the width of the top base were 17, 28, 39 and 50 microns, and the corresponding ranges of permissible values of the probe thickness for cases with 1 electrode – 30–58 microns, 2 and 3 electrodes – 30–51 microns, 4 and 5 electrodes – 30–43 microns, and for the case of a probe with 6 and 7 electrodes – 30–35 microns. The correction value of the mask size is estimated, reflecting the effect of etching conditions on the probe geometry.
References
interfacing, Science Advances, 2017, Vol. 3 (6), e1601649.
2. Seymour J.P., Wu F., Wise K.D. [et al.]. State-of-the-art MEMS and microsystem tools for
brain research // Microsystems & Nanoengineering. – 2017. – Vol. 3. – 16066.
3. Obidin N., Tasnim F., Dagdeviren C. The Future of Neuroimplantable Devices: A Materials
Science and Regulatory Perspective, Advanced Materials, 2019, Vol. 32 (15), 1901482.
4. Szostak K.M., Grand L., Constandinou T.G. Neural Interfaces for Intracortical Recording:
Requirements, Fabrication Methods, and Characteristics // Frontiers in Neuroscience. – 2017.
– Vol. 11. – 665.
5. Leuthardt E.C., Schalk G., Wolpaw J.R. [et al.]. A brain-computer interface using
electrocorticographic signals in humans, J. Neural Eng., 2004, Vol. 1, pp. 63-71.
6. Normann R.A., Fernandez E. Clinical applications of penetrating neural interfaces and Utah
Electrode Array technologies, Journal of Neural Engineering, 2016, Vol. 13 (6), 061003.
7. Govindarajan A.V., Je M., Park W.-T., Achyuta A.K.H. MEMS as implantable neuroprobes,
MEMS for Biomedical Applications. Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2012, pp. 361-395.
8. Jun J.J., Steinmetz N.A., Siegle J.H. [et al.]. Fully integrated silicon probes for high-density
recording of neural activity, Nature, 2017, Vol. 551, No. 7679, pp. 232-236.
9. Gao K., Li S., Zhuang L. [et al.]. In vivo bioelectronic nose using transgenic mice for specific
odor detection, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2018, Vol. 102, pp. 150-156.
10. Negi S., Bhandari R. Silicon isotropic and anisotropic etching for MEMS applications, Microsystem
Technologies, 2013, Vol. 19 (2), pp. 203-210.
11. Nanotekhnologii v mikroelektronike [Nanotechnologies in microelectronics], ed. by
O.A. Ageeva, B.G. Konoplyova. Moscow: Nauka, 2019, 511 p. ISBN 978-5-02-040201-0.
12. Shikida M., Sato K., Tokoro K., Uchikawa D. Differences in anisotropic etching properties of KOH
and TMAH solutions, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2000, Vol. 80, No. 2, pp. 179-188.
13. Zubel I. Anisotropic etching of Si, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2019,
Vol. 29, No. 9, 093002.
14. Rao A.V.N., Swarnalatha V., Pal P. Etching characteristics of Si {110} in 20% KOH with addition
of hydroxylamine for the fabrication of bulk micromachined MEMS, Micro and Nano Systems
Letters, 2017, Vol. 5, No. 23, pp. 1-9.
15. Malokhatko S.V., Gusev E. Yu. Issledovaniye maskiruyushchikh svoystv plenok oksida
kremniya dlya sozdaniya kremniyevykh membran metodom zhidkostnogo travleniya [Research
of masking properties of silicon oxide films for silicon membrane fabrication by wet
etching], Izvestiya YuFU. Tekhnicheskie nauki [Izvestiya SFedU. Engineering Sciences], 2020,
No. 6, pp. 196-203.
16. Stiller A.M., González-González M.A., Boothby J.M. [et al.]. Mechanical considerations for
design and implementation of peripheral intraneural devices, Journal of Neural Engineering,
2019, Vol. 16 (6), 064001.
17. Seidel H., Csepregi L., Heuberger A. [et al.]. Anisotropic etching of crystalline silicon in alkaline
solutions I. Orientation dependence and behavior of passivation layers, Journal of the
Electrochemical Society, 1990, Vol. 137 (11), pp. 3612-3625.
18. Malohatko S.V., Gusev E.Yu., Ageev O.A. Razrabotka strelovidnogo kantilevera dlya
mnogochastotnoj atomno-silovoj mikroskopii [Development of the swept cantilever for
multifrequency atomic force microscopy], Izvestiya YuFU. Tekhnicheskie nauki [Izvestiya
SFedU. Engineering Sciences], 2019, No. 3, pp. 171-178.
19. Gusev E.Yu., Jityaeva J.Y. Tekhnologiya izgotovleniya mnogoelektrodnogo mikrozonda dlya
maloinva-zivnogo nejrokomp'yuternogo interfejsa [Process technology of multielectrode microprobe
for a minimally invasive neurocomputer interface], Izvestiya YuFU. Tekhnicheskie
nauki [Izvestiya SFedU. Engineering Sciences], 2019, No. 6, pp. 61-70.
20. Pal P., Swarnalatha V., Rao A.V.N. [et al.]. High speed silicon wet anisotropic etching for applications
in bulk micromachining: a review, Micro and Nano Systems Letters, 2021, Vol. 9, 4.
