IMPACT OF PORTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES ON AIRCRAFT AVIONICS

Abstract

The article is devoted to the topical problem of analyzing the risks that arise during the operation of aircraft in cases where portable electronic devices are on board the aircraft, and the choice of methods for checking the resistance of onboard equipment to the effects of such devices. The article considers all possible ways of propagation of spurious and intentional emissions from portable electronic devices to avionics systems and analyzes two main aspects of the impact of portable electronic devices on aircraft avionics. The first aspect defines the aircraft system and qualification guidelines for radio-exposed equipment that provide immunity to radio emissions from intentionally transmitting portable electronic devices. This is usually interpreted as protection against the impact of portable electronic devices "through the back door." The second aspect defines acceptable interference that causes bandwidth loss between aircraft radios and spurious portable electronic devices. This is commonly referred to as "front door" protection against portable devices. Based on an analysis of the main risks associated with interference from portable electronic devices to aircraft systems, aircraft systems have been identified for which a demonstration of compliance with the resistance to the effects of portable electronic devices must be performed. In order to demonstrate the suitability of the front door immunity of aircraft equipment, it is necessary to assess the levels of possible interference from portable electronic devices in the reception band of aircraft equipment. Demonstrating the compliance of aircraft equipment for “through the back door” exposure is similar to demonstrating resistance to high-intensity electromagnetic fields and indirect lightning strikes. It is necessary to perform one of the two proposed methods to establish their susceptibility to radio emission and control levels of the susceptibility of aircraft systems to radio emission. The first method is related to the delivery of equipment to the test bench for RF emissions, the second method is to test the systems that are installed on the applicable aircraft. Recommendations have been developed on the choice of methods for verifying the resistance of aircraft systems to the impact of portable devices. The impact aspects analyzed will help determine the scope and methodology for conducting tests to remove restrictions on the use of portable electronic devices on board aircraft.

Authors

References

1. RTCA DO-119, Interference to aircraft electronic equipment from devices carried aboard,
RTCA, April 1963.
2. RTCA DO-294B, Guidance on allowing transmitting portable electronic de- vices (t- peds) on
aircraft, December 2006.
3. RTCA DO-199, Potential interference to aircraft electronic equipment from devices carried
aboard, RTCA, September 1988.
4. RTCA DO-233, Portable electronic devices carried on board aircraft, August 1996, Errata
August 1999.
5. Strauss W. Portable electronic devices onboard commercial aircraft: assessing the risks. Ph.D.
Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 2005 Carnegie-Mellon report.
6. NASA ASRS Database Report Set, “passenger electronic devices”, Update Number 11.0, January
23, 2007.
7. EUROCAE ED 118, Report on electromagnetic compatibility between passenger carried portable
electronic devices (peds) and aircraft systems, November 2003.
8. Rukovodstvo po upravleniyu bezopasnost'yu poletov (RUBP) IKAO Doc 9859 AN/474,
izdanie tret'e – 2013 [ICAO Safety Management Manual Doc 9859 AN/474, third edition –
2013].
9. Rukovodstvo po organizatsii kontrolya za obespecheniem bezopasnosti poletov Doc 9734
AN/959 [Guidelines for the organization of control over flight safety Doc 9734 AN/959].
10. Rukovodstvo po provedeniyu proverok organizatsii kontrolya Doc 9735 AN/960 [Guidelines
for conducting inspections of the organization of control Doc 9735 AN/960].
11. ARP5583. Guide to certification of aircraft in a high intensity radiated field (hirf) environment.
2010.
12. EUROCAE ED 107. Guide to certification of aircraft in a high-intensity radiated field (HIRF)
environment. 2010.
13. AC/AMJ 20.1317. The certification of aircraft electrical and electronic systems for operation
in the high intensity radiated field (HIRF) environment, 1998.
14. SAE ARP 5416 Revision A - aircraft lightning test methods, SAE Aerospace, 2013.
15. SAE ARP 5412 Revision B - aircraft lightning environment and related test waveforms, SAE
Aerospace, 2013.
16. AC 20 136 Revision B - Aircraft electrical and electronic system lightning protection, Federal
Aviation Administration, 2011.
17. 14 CFR. Code of Federal Regulations CFR). Title 14. Aeronautics and space.
18. CS-25 EASA. Certification Specification. Large aeroplanes.
19. RTCA DO-160E. Environmental conditions and test procedures for airborne equipment, December
2004.
20. EUROCAE ED 14. Environmental conditions and test procedures for airborne equipment
training, revision G, January 2015.
21. EUROCAE ED-130. Guidance for the development of portable electronic devices (ped) tolerance
for civil aircraft, revision b, June 2022.

Скачивания

Published:

2023-02-27

Issue:

Section:

SECTION III. ELECTRONICS, NANOTECHNOLOGY AND INSTRUMENTATION

Keywords:

Portable electronic devices, high-intensity radiated fields