METHODOLOGICAL BASES AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF OPTIMIZATION TASKS OF THE BEARING STRUCTURES OF THE STRAPDOWN INERTIAL NAVIGATION SYSTEMS

Abstract

This article describes approaches to solving problems of optimization of bearing structure of strapdown inertial navigation systems (SINS). A typical optimization problem in this case is multiobjective parametric optimization of the bearing structure of the SINS accelerometer triad in order to minimize the mass of the bearing structure and minimize deviation angles of the accelerometer axes under the action of external loads. The ANSYS Mechanical and ANSYS DesignXplorer modules are used as a tool for numerical modeling and optimization, respectively. Practical issues related to parameterization of SINS bearing structure 3D-models, calculation of accelerometer axes deviation angles, possible variants of numerical experiment plans, estimation of response sensitivity to input parameters, generation and refinement of the response surface, and multiobjective optimization are considered. For the rational parametrization of geometry, the SINS device assembly was decomposed, as a result of which the parts and structural elements that have the greatest influence on the considered objective functions were identified. To calculate the deviation angles of the sensitive elements axes, special two-node finite elements and relations for the Bryant angles were used, which describe the relative position in space of two coordinate systems. When planning a numerical experiment, at the first stage of optimization, a central composition plan was used, and at subsequent stages, the parameter space was filled using the Latin hypercube method with the option of relations between parameters, which made it possible to avoid degenerate design options. The response surface was built using the genetic aggregation method and subsequently refined based on a set of optimal solutions. Optimization for conflicting goals of mass minimization and stiffness maximization was carried out using a multiobjective genetic algorithm. The described set of approaches to solving optimization problems as a result of an exemplary series of calculations made it possible to reduce the mass of a serial SINS bearing structure part by 23% with fixed stiffness.

Authors

References

1. Chatfield A.B. Fundamentals of High Accuracy Inertial Navigation. AIAA, 1997.
2. Titterton D., Weston J. Strapdown Inertial Navigation Technology. Institution of Engineering
and Technology, 2005.
3. Lawrence A. Modern Inertial Technology: Navigation, Guidance, and Control. Springer, 2012.
4. Noureldin A., Karamat T.B., and Georgy J. Fundamentals of Inertial Navigation, Satellitebased
Positioning and their Integration. Springer, 2013.
5. Peshekhonov V.G. Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya giroskopicheskikh sistem
[Current state and development prospects of gyroscopic systems], Giroskopiya i navigatsiya
[Gyroscopy and Navigation], 2011, No. 1, pp. 3-16.
6. Klimkovich B.V., Tolochko A.M. Kalibrovka BINS navigatsionnogo klassa tochnosti v
inertsial'nom rezhime [SINS calibration of navigation accuracy class in inertial mode], XXII
Sankt-Peterburgskaya mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya po integrirovannym navigatsionnym
sistemam: Sb. materialov [St. Petersburg International Conference on Integrated Navigation
Systems: Proceedings]. Saint Pbetersburg, 2015, pp. 250-256.
7. Savage P.G. Strapdown Sensors. AGARD Lecture Series, Strapdown Inertial Systems, 1978,
No. 95.
8. Zienkiewicz O.C. The Finite Element Method. McGraw-Hill Company. London, 1977.
9. Frolov A.V. Optimizatsii konstruktsii nesushchey sistemy vysokodinamichnogo BINS s
ispol'zovaniem pokazatelya sbalansirovannoy tochnosti [Optimization of the Design of the
Carrier System of a Highly Dynamic SINS Using the Balanced Accuracy Index], Izvestiya
TulGU. Tekhnicheskie nauki [Izvestiya TulGU. Technical science], 2021, No. 1, pp. 74-90.
10. SpaceClaim Online Help. Available at: https://help.spaceclaim.com/2015.0.0/en/Content/Support.
html. Checked 01.04.2023.
11. Nikravesh P. Computer-aided analysis of mechanical systems. Prentice Hall, Englewood
Cliffs, New Jersey, 1988.
12. Ansys Help. Available at: https://ansyshelp.ansys.com. Checked 01.04.2023.
13. Fisher R.A. The Design of Experiment. 9-th ed. London: Macmillan, 1971, 497 p.
14. Box G.E., Behnken D.W. Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables,
Technometrics, 1960, No. 2, pp. 455-475.
15. Box G.E., Hunter W.G., Hunter S.J. Statistics for experimenters: An introduction to design,
data analysis, and model building. New York: Wiley, 1978, 275 p.
16. Adler Yu.P., Markova E.V., Granovskiy Yu.V. Planirovanie eksperimenta pri poiske
optimal'nykh usloviy [Planning an experiment in the search for optimal conditions]. Moscow:
Nauka, 1976, 278 p.
17. Nalimov V.V., Golikova T.I. Logicheskie osnovaniya planirovaniya eksperimenta [Logical
foundations for planning an experiment]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Metallurgiya, 1981, 151 p.
18. Sobol' I.M. Tochki, ravnomerno zapolnyayushchie mnogomernyy kub [Points uniformly filling
a multidimensional cube], Novoe v zhizni, nauke, tekhnike. Ser. Matematika, kibernetika [New
in life, science, technology. Ser. Mathematics, cybernetics], 1985, No. 2, pp. 14-24.
19. Montgomeri D.K. Planirovanie eksperimenta i analiz dannykh [Experiment design and data
analysis]. Leningrad: Sudostroenie, 1980, 384 p.
20. McKay M.D., Beckman R.J., Conover W.J. A comparison of three methods for selecting values
of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code, Technometrics. American
Statistical Association, 1979, No. 21 (2), pp. 239-245.
21. Ben Salem M., Tomaso L. Automatic selection for general surrogate models, Structural and
Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2018, No. 58 (2), pp. 719-734.
22. Ben Salem M., Roustant O., Gamboa F., Tomaso L. Universal prediction distribution for surrogate
models, SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification, 2017, No. 5 (1), pp. 1086-1109.
23. Murata T., Ishibuchi H. MOGA: multi-objective genetic algorithms, International Conference
on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE, 1995, pp. 289-924.
24. Deb K. Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Chichester: John Wiley &
Sons, Ltd, 2001, 520 p.

Published:

2023-04-10

Issue:

Section:

SECTION IV. COMMUNICATION, NAVIGATION AND GUIDANCE

Keywords:

SINS, numerical simulation, ANSYS, multiobjective parametric optimization, accelerometer, axis deviation angles